Double-slit interference experiment (Young's interference experiment), first conducted by Thomas Young in 1801, is a classic demonstration of the phenomenon of interference. This experiment shows that light behaves as a wave when passing through two closely spaced slits with a width comparable to its wavelength.
According to Huygens' principle, each slit acts as a source of secondary waves upon interacting with light wave. Because these new light sources are coherent and in-phase, their superposition forms a characteristic interference pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen.
Let us consider a point on a screen located at a distance \(L\) from two parallel slits, which are illuminated by a coherent light wave with wavelength \(\lambda\). The phase relationship of the waves at the observation point depends on the path difference between the rays arriving from each slit: \(\Delta\phi = \frac{2\pi d}{\lambda} \sin(\varphi)\).
If the path difference is equal to an integral number of wavelengths the waves will interfere constructively, leading to a bright spot on the screen. The condition for maximum intensity: $$ d\sin\varphi = \pm m \lambda $$
The condition for minimum intensity for observation destructive interference is given by $$ d\sin\varphi = \pm (2m + 1)\frac{\lambda}{2} $$ where \(m = 1,2,3...\) order of diffraction, \(d\) is the distance between the centres of the slits and \(\varphi\) is the angular position of the observation point on the screen relative to the central axis.
To determine how light intensity varies as a function of position on the screen in a double-slit experiment, one must consider the combined effects of interference from the coherent light waves emerging from the two slits and diffraction due to the finite width of each slit. $$I(\varphi) = I_i(\varphi) I_d(\varphi)$$ $$I(\varphi) = I_0\cos^2\left(\frac{\pi d}{\lambda} \sin(\varphi) \right)\text{sinc}^2\left(\frac{\pi a}{\lambda} \sin(\varphi)\right)$$
In this section, wave propagation (the initial state of which is given by the Gaussian profile in the previous section) through the barrier is simulated. In other words, here we can analyze the temporal evolution of the wave packet in the barrier system.
More detailed information can be found in [P. Cheinet],
(a) Principle of a Three-Pulse Atom Interferometer based on simulated Raman transition
(b) the schematic of energy levels of \(^{87}Rb\).
[M.Langlois],
Two counter-propagating laser beams, whose frequency difference resonates with the energy separation between the two hyperfine levels \(|a⟩ = |5S_{\frac{1}{2}}, F = 1⟩\) and \(|b⟩ = |5S_{\frac{1}{2}}, F = 2⟩\),
induce a transition between these two levels, that accompanied by a momentum transfer of \( \hbar(k_1 - k_2) = \hbar k_{eff}\) from the two beams, allowing for the spatial separation of the two states.
After being selected in the state \(|{a}\rangle\), the \(^{87}Rb\) atoms will undergo, in order: a \(\frac {\pi} 2\) transition (splitting), a \(\pi\) transition (mirror), and a \(\frac {\pi} 2\) transition (recombination).
To determine \(g\), we need to know the probability of finding an atom in one of the states:
$$P=\frac {N_{|{a}\rangle}}{N_{|{a}\rangle}+ N_{|{b}\rangle}}$$
Interference fringes. The transition probability is measured as a function of the frequency ramp applied to the Raman beams. The fringe that remains dark, regardless of the interrogation time, is the one for which the ramp precisely compensates for the Doppler effect, thereby allowing the measurement of \(g\). [F. PEREIRA DOS SANTOS].
From this data, we obtain \(\alpha_0/2\pi = 25.1442 MHz.s^{-1}\);
Using the formula for \(g\) and the value of \(k_{eff} = 2 \pi * 2.56330737276 * 10^6 \) for Rubidium-87 atoms, we calculate \(g = 9.809280099298581 \frac{m}{s^2}\)
THE PROJECT IS SUPPORTED BY